My path into this work was not linear, and I am not sure I would have wanted it to be. I began as an academic researcher at USP, the Universidade de São Paulo, where I joined GEASIA, the Asian Studies group within NUPRI, the research center on international relations. Japan entered my life as a scholarly subject and stayed as something considerably more complicated.
Then came the diagnosis. Living with fibrous dysplasia and McCune-Albright syndrome moved accessibility from a research interest to a daily condition, and it changed what I thought research was for. The questions I had been asking about aging populations and disability infrastructure stopped being abstract.
Today the work runs on three tracks that feed each other: academic research and publication, public advocacy for rare disease patients across Brazil and the United States, and teaching and speaking to audiences who would never read a journal article. None of these would be as good without the other two.
How I Work
Comparative by default. Nothing gets studied in isolation. Japan and Brazil read each other.
Lived experience counts as evidence. Not instead of data. Alongside it.
Research leaves the building. If it stays in a journal, it has not finished its job.
Four languages, one argument. The audience changes. The rigor does not.